Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?

A research paper submitted to the Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE) Vol. 4, No. 1; 2015.

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Cosmas, Julius
Natura: Articolo
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Canadian Center of Science and Education 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v4n1p1
https://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/123456789/712
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1820347762994053120
author Cosmas, Julius
author_facet Cosmas, Julius
author_sort Cosmas, Julius
collection DSpace
description A research paper submitted to the Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE) Vol. 4, No. 1; 2015.
format Article
id oai:41.59.85.69:123456789-712
institution Mzumbe University
language English
publishDate 2024
publisher Canadian Center of Science and Education
record_format dspace
spelling oai:41.59.85.69:123456789-7122024-04-23T11:01:16Z Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model? Cosmas, Julius investor state adjudication system legitimacy crisis dispute settlement system A research paper submitted to the Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE) Vol. 4, No. 1; 2015. While the World Trade Organization dispute settlement system is prospering, the investor – state dispute settlement system is in shambles and need immediate attention. This article argues that investor – state dispute settlement system need to gather experience from the WTO system so as to increase its legitimacy. The article looks at the issues haunting the investor – state adjudication system and examines how the same have been addressed at the World Trade Organization. The WTO DSU is taken as a comparator because it is being praised for attaining legitimacy within a short period of time. The article concludes that investor – state adjudicative system has a lot to learn from the WTO adjudicative system with regards to costs, timeframe, remedies and the appellate structure. Private 2024-04-23T11:01:12Z 2024-04-23T11:01:12Z 2015 Article Chicago 1927-5242 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v4n1p1 https://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/123456789/712 en application/pdf Canadian Center of Science and Education
spellingShingle investor
state adjudication system
legitimacy crisis
dispute settlement system
Cosmas, Julius
Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
title Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
title_full Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
title_fullStr Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
title_full_unstemmed Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
title_short Improving the legitimacy of investor – state dispute settlement system: can the WTO DSU system Act as a model?
title_sort improving the legitimacy of investor state dispute settlement system can the wto dsu system act as a model
topic investor
state adjudication system
legitimacy crisis
dispute settlement system
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v4n1p1
https://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/123456789/712
work_keys_str_mv AT cosmasjulius improvingthelegitimacyofinvestorstatedisputesettlementsystemcanthewtodsusystemactasamodel