Pastoralism reorganised: Maasai resilience and governance in the shadow of mega-infrastructure in Tanzania
Mega-infrastructure projects are widely promoted as engines of modernisation in Africa, yet their implications for pastoralist societies remain contested. this article examines how Tanzania’s Standard Gauge railway (SGr) has reshaped livelihoods, governance, and spatial practices among the Ilparakuy...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
Cogent Social Sciences- Taylor &Francis
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2626598 https://scholar.mzumbe.ac.tz/handle/123456789/2187 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Mega-infrastructure projects are widely promoted as engines of modernisation in Africa, yet their implications for pastoralist societies remain contested. this article examines how Tanzania’s Standard Gauge railway (SGr) has reshaped livelihoods, governance, and spatial practices among the Ilparakuyo Maasai in Kilosa District. using interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations, the study draws on lefebvre’s notion
of the production of space and resilience theory to analyze community responses. the findings show that the SGr has not displaced pastoralists but reorganised their practices through adaptation rather than transformation. Stations and adjacent settlements became economic hubs appropriated by women traders and youth entrepreneurs, with profits often reinvested in livestock, reinforcing pastoral continuity. resilience emerged through livelihood diversification, though unevenly distributed across households.
Governance appeared as a contested arena, where elders mediated disputes, women pressed for inclusion, and state regulations reshaped authority. the study argues that the SGR generates hybrid socio-spatial realities in which pastoralists assert agency, reorganise livelihoods, and renegotiate authority. By moving beyond binary narratives of disruption versus modernisation, it extends debates on infrastructure, resilience, and governance in African rangelands. |
|---|