Judicial deliberations : a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy /
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial...
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Libro |
| Pubblicazione: |
Oxford :
Oxford University Press ,
c2009.
|
| Serie: | Oxford studies in European law
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| Riassunto: | Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed |
|---|---|
| Descrizione fisica: | ix, 382 p. ; 24 cm. |
| Bibliografia: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9780199575169 |