Judicial deliberations : a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy /
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | |
| Опубликовано: |
Oxford :
Oxford University Press ,
c2009.
|
| Серии: | Oxford studies in European law
|
| Предметы: | |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
| Итог: | Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed |
|---|---|
| Объем: | ix, 382 p. ; 24 cm. |
| Библиография: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ISBN: | 9780199575169 |