Image from Coce
Image from OpenLibrary

Judicial deliberations : a comparative analysis of judicial transparency and legitimacy / Mitchel de S.-O.-L'E. Lasser.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Oxford studies in European lawPublication details: Oxford : Oxford University Press , c2009.Description: ix, 382 p. ; 24 cmISBN:
  • 9780199575169
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 347.013 LAS
Summary: Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Call number Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds
Book Mzumbe University Main Campus Library Mzumbe University Main Campus Library 347.013 LAS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available For reference only. 0067060
Book Mzumbe University Main Campus Library Mzumbe University Main Campus Library 347.013 LAS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 2 Available For reference only. 0067062
Book Mzumbe University Main Campus Library Mzumbe University Main Campus Library 347.013 LAS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 3 Available For reference only. 0067061
Total holds: 0

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed

eng.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Mzumbe University Library
©2022